So, the news is that the staff shortage in Transport & Storage apparently returns to being no worse than normal, according to the latest figures released by the ONS (Office for National Statistics) last week.

The graph below shows the number of vacancies, in thousands, for the whole economy (blue line, left hand axis) versus the Transport & Storage sector (red line, right hand axis) for the period August to October each year. It can be seen that the general pattern has been very similar since 2009, apart from a sudden increase last year. But it then appears to have returned to normal.

Now you can’t equate the Transport & Storage sector directly to Logistics. The former will include passenger transport, but won’t include logistics staff employed by, for example, retail companies. The T&S figure for employees is 1.6m July-Sept and also for Oct to Dec last year (these figures come from an ONS data set covering a different timeframe for reporting to vacancies). In a report published about a year ago, the FTA (Freight Transport Association) estimated that there are 1.8m people employed in logistics companies and 2.7m logistics employees in total.

But you could argue that Transport & Storage is better off generally than the rest of the economy. The vacancy ratio per 100 employee jobs has actually been the same or less in Transport & Storage than for the rest of the economy for all of this period, and is now 2.2 for Transport & Storage compared with 2.8 for the UK as a whole. The question is, does it feel like that on the ground?

There is a driver crisis, but we need to tackle it rather than exaggerate. We need to make the jobs attractive. There are over 940K people with HGV licences and up to date medicals, including over 100K people aged 25-45 with C+E licences who choose not to use them. There is a crisis, not a shortage. If you want to understand the graph fully, then read my four-pager here: Driver Crisis

At first glance the data released by the ONS (Office for National Statistics) during the past month on the number of people employed in transport and storage doesn't seem to tell any fresh stories. What it has shown since the financial crisis is that there was a much bigger comparative drop in the number of people employed in our sector than for the economy overall, and not just on a one-off basis.

The purple line (all in employment) on the graph below only really does a bit of a plateau following the collapse of Lehman Brothers et al. Whereas the red line (transport & storage) shows a drop of more than 12%, despite the increasing work content of burgeoning ecommerce. It's worth noting at this point that transport and storage does include passenger transport as well as logistics-related employment. It appears that our efficient and flexible transport & logistics industry was better and/or more able (compelled by cost control or perhaps because of low commitment to agency staff) at reducing personnel in a way that was not typical of the economy as a whole.

What also happened following the financial crash was that vacancies in transport and storage (not shown on graph, but in data released by the ONS at the same time) ran at a lower rate than for the economy in general. As a low margin industry we tend to use overtime as a first resort and hold off on recruitment until it becomes imperative. And the seasonal nature of our industry also means that we're loath to take on people for December who won't be needed come February. But, although we're back to a similar rate of vacancies per 100 employee jobs as the rest of the economy in this latest set of data, at peak last year we did move ahead and continue to have more than 40K vacancies (that's including warehouse staff and passenger transport), albeit still with a lower rate of vacancies than for a number of other sectors.

Last week the BBC carried the news that UK unemployment has fallen to a 42-year low, and I imagine that there are people in the logistics industry thinking that the driver crisis will get worse.

During August, two stats that are of interest to the road transport industry have been released by the ONS: the SPPI index for freight transport by road and the number of people working as LGV drivers. Earlier this summer, and for the first time in over a year, the figures for the number of people with LGV licences was released by DVLA. And also, during the spring, the FTA's Logistics Report 2017.

The graph below shows the various driver related-figures - the number of C&CE licences (on the left hand side) is for GB only, the number of people working as large goods vehicle drivers (the middle block) is for the UK including Northern Ireland. The relative size of the 'shortage' can clearly be seen - the tiny block on the right hand side of the graph.

This update continues below the graph...

The number of licences held is for people with medicals, but not necessarily DQCs ...so it would take just a week's training, with no test, for that not to be an issue if someone wanted to get work in our industry. It looks as if CE(db) is drivers with a 102 code - ie restricted to drawbars, although I'd like to see that in writing. It doesn't include more than a quarter million provisional LGV licences.

What the SPPI index for freight transport by road shows (not on the graph) is that haulage rates have risen by less than 1% over the whole of the past five years.

Brexit is coming and the driver crisis is not about to solve itself - something has to change.

You can find the various sets of statistics here:

• BBC article on unemployment
• Licence numbers from DVLA - see tab DRL110
• Number working as LGV drivers - from ONS
• Estimate of driver shortage from FTA - p85 of report
• SPPI inc road freight index - from ONS

If you found this piece interesting, you may be interested in our page on the driver crisis.

I wasn't intending to revisit the topic of drivers' hours, but last week the ONS (Office for National Statistics) published the latest Annual Survey of Hours & Earnings. Among a wide variety of statistics, they include paid hours worked by occupation, one of which is "Transport and mobile machine drivers and operatives" - wider than HGV drivers, it includes approx 670K full-time workers.

A quick explanation before looking at the graph. The median is the value below which 50% of jobs fall. It is ONS's preferred measure of average as it is less affected by a relatively small number of very high values. It therefore gives a better indication of "typical" than the mean. And percentiles mark the values below which certain proportions of jobs fall - for example, the 75th percentile is the value below which 75% of jobs fall.

What the graph below shows is the estimated hours worked per week across all occupations in the UK (red) and those worked for Occupation Code 82, Transport and mobile machine drivers and operatives (blue). The different shading shows median (deep colour), 75th percentile (lighter colour) and 90th percentile (outline only).

It can be seen that this occupation grouping, which includes HGV drivers, works considerably more hours than the UK average for full-timers (to which, of course, it is a contributor), and is the occupation (out of 34 groups) with the highest median, 75th and 90th percentiles.

Some other notes: ASHE covers employee jobs in the United Kingdom. It does not cover the self-employed, nor does it cover employees not paid during the reference period. I've used the figures for full-time (so no part-time employees included). It should be noted that these figures are provisional and are accompanied by indications of their likely accuracy.

The newspapers are currently full of all the disadvantages, both realised and potential, that arise from the "decisive result"* in the EU referendum. Assuming the country does go ahead with Brexit, there is potential improvement it could bring to the logistics industry and that is revision of hours rules that apply to drivers of heavy goods vehicles on non-international journeys.

In fairness to the EU, I think that the legislators had envisaged time would be more controlled by the amount of driving that could be undertaken, and hadn't foreseen a situation where the UK driver's life consisted of so much hanging around for one reason and another. Are the long days that have resulted, certainly in this country, one of the things that stops driving being an attractive job option?

Before EU drivers' hours regulations came along, the Transport Act of 1968 restricted the driver's working day to 12.5 hours through what was referred to as "spreadover".

And that was the case up until the amendments in 1986, which abolished the 1968 limits on driver duty when a driver was covered by EC rules - the new provisions on rest periods within the EC rules were seen as effectively limiting the hours for which a driver could be on duty.

In 2005 the Working Time Directive was applied to the road transport industry, with the very weak interpretation of PoAs (Periods of Availability) that was adopted in the UK. And that weak interpretation was accompanied by a casual approach to its use, in many ways turning what should have been protective legislation into just another administrative task.

However, until 2007, any reduction in daily rest from 11 to 9 hours still had to be made up by the end of the following week. After EC regulation 561/2006 was introduced in April 2007, no rest compensation was required.

Could a return to the past be helpful? Certainly pay would need to reflect the change as drivers would still have the same rent to pay and families to feed. It would not be an easy pill for industry to swallow. But I'm interested in how much could be made up for by efficiencies: reducing PoAs, which are often effectively an admission of wasted driver time. Would limiting the length of the working day back to the 12.5 hour spreadover help to make the job more attractive?

That change in April 2007 means that each and every week can include three 15 hour days. And after each of those 15 hours days, the driver needs to travel home, eat and say goodnight, before sleeping for a few hours and then getting up again ...quite probably at what I've seen described as stupid o'clock. Would you want to work those hours?

*37.4% of the UK electorate voted "Leave" in the EU referendum.

As this update is more of a blog, with no statistics as such, I've gone for a Wordle rather than a graph this time - click the pic to see how to create your own:

Update on 9 Nov: It's great to see this piece reported on in Transport Operator as part of a piece on driver wages.

Over the past month or so, I've published a couple of pieces on the driver shortage and age profile of HGV drivers - one in the Chartered Institute of Logistics & Transport's Focus magazine, and the other as an update on our own website and as a Linkedin post. The more I've researched it, the more interested I've become in the paucity of statistics around this issue. Previously published figures didn't reveal what was happening between the ages of 35 and 64 - it could even have been interpreted as being pretty flat if you didn't know the industry. And these are the figures decision makers see and use.

So I made a special request for data from the Office for National Statistics which was published earlier today - I'm very grateful for the prompt response! This data is in five year age bands (apart from the very youngest and oldest drivers), and to my knowledge is the first time that these figures have been published at this level of granularity. You can see some of this data included in the graph (update continues below graph).

What are the headlines from the graph and other fresh statistics?

• There were less HGV drivers employed July to September 2015 than in the previous quarter and against the same period last year - interesting
• The profile is anything but flat between 35 and 64 - we all knew it wasn't, but now everyone can see that is the case
• Over the past year, the age band with the largest number of drivers stopped being 45-49 and moved to 50-54 - drivers are getting older
• The number of over 65s continues to increase - drivers are getting even older
• But the real headline is that we can see the age profile properly for the first time

Where does this information come from? It comes from the Labour Force Survey, and I quote: The primary purpose of the Labour Force Survey (LFS) is "providing good quality point in time and change estimates for various labour market outputs and related topics". The labour market covers all aspects of people's work, including the education and training needed to equip them for work, the jobs themselves, job-search for those out of work, and income from work and benefits.

How do they establish how many HGV drivers there are? The sorts of questions asked in the surveys to establish what work people do include "What was your (main) job (in the week ending Sunday the [date])?", "What did you mainly do in your job?" and "What did the firm/organisation you worked for mainly make or do (at the place where you worked)?". The surveys also ask about work-related and vocational qualifications such as HGV and forklift licences.

Now a survey is a survey. ONS will have designed the sample to give statistically significant results - indeed some of the supporting documentation describing how they go about this runs to over 100 pages a piece. With the sample consisting of about 100,000 individuals per quarter, large goods vehicle drivers representing about 1% of the workforce and then broken into 10 age bands, it doesn't take a mathematician to see that there is room for the figures to have some 'flexibility'. But overall they contribute to the same storyline.

What it would be good to see now is data about ALL large goods vehicle drivers - the DVLA DQC data that was published by the FTA earlier this year, split by narrower age-bands. At the same time that I asked the ONS (who it has to be said are set up to provide statistics, by definition) for enhanced data, I also asked DLVA ...early days, but I've yet to have a reply to my email.

You can access the data and read about how to interpret it.

And here's some Linkedin conversation following the update above:

The RHA needs to be congratulated on the initiative that is National Lorry Week and the #LoveTheLorry / #HGVHeroes campaign. And its members need to be thanked for rising to the occasion and putting on imaginative events around the country, demonstrating to the public that the industry takes pride in its task of delivering the daily miracle that is logistics. It's inspiring, and we all need to hope that it will attract new drivers. No-one should be in any doubt that the industry desperately needs them, with younger HGV drivers coming on-stream at less than a third of the rate required to replace older ones.

RHA members as a group were hit hard by the drop of business in the recession, with tonnage carried by mainly public carriers dropping by more than a third over two years. Own account operators kept their business in house and had a much more stable workload, with tonne-km even going up over those same two years. Unfortunately the latest DfT figures in this area are for 2013, so it's not possible for me to say where things are today, but no doubt those same RHA members will be expecting and wanting to take up increased business but with a limited key resource, namely HGV drivers.

What is available for June 2015, is the licensing figures, which show that there are 7% less HGVs than in 2007, although those vehicles have been getting heavier - in 2000 around 26% of artics were over 40 tonnes, whereas by 2013 this had risen to 77%. And HGV mileage has been reducing - by 2013 over 10% less than in 2000. I know that some believe the reduction in HGV miles is a good thing, potentially demonstrating efficiencies in our industry, but I don't think that view can be supported - in the same period, light van traffic rose by over 30%. Now, the nature of the jobs some of those vans carry out, like delivering to homes and restricted town centres, cannot be undertaken by bigger vehicles, but we need to avoid the situation where vans are being used as a substitute for proper trucks because they don't require an HGV driver.

Now some may regard my next point as history, but I'm going to raise it as I believe its ghost is still haunting us. The removal of the 12.5 hour spreadover back in 1986 facilitated, at best, laxness to creep in when scheduling drivers - agency drivers waiting for work, spending an eight hour day in the works canteen before being given five drops in central London. At worst it allowed managers to contemplate scheduling workers' lives in a way where day drivers could morph into night drivers. And when the Mobile Workers Directive came in, Periods of Availability allowed that laxness to continue. However, hauliers now rely on this flexibility to get the job done. And therein lies the rub.

Commentators who say that people know about the conditions and long hours when they come into the industry are missing the point. One has to ask how many older drivers would come into the industry today, particularly as agency drivers. It's not about those already in the industry, they are putting up with it - this is about attracting fresh blood, and fast.

So congratulations and thanks to the RHA and its members - I want to be able to carry on buying food and all the other stuff, and I'm grateful to everyone who gets it there!

And here's some Linkedin conversation following the update above:

Earlier this month Croner published this year's Distribution & Transport Rewards - always an excellent source of information.

One's immediate reaction is to be a little bit surprised that, with all the talk of the driver shortage, median average earnings for a Class C+E driver have taken a bit (4%) of a dip in the latest survey and median basic pay is continues to be down against 2013. Now, any survey depends on who participates, and it could be that a high paying company has dropped out. But now we're in the new normal following the recession, it's as important to understand what wages can buy, and where they're pitched, as what they are per se. To what extent does all the hard work of getting and maintaining a class 1 licence pay for itself?

The graph below shows Class C+E basic pay and average earnings over the past 10 years as a percentage of corresponding light vehicle driver wage levels. Back in 2005, following the first wave of eastern Europeans arriving in 2004, an artic driver could expect a 20% premium for having his (or her) licence. Despite the ups and downs, that premium has now risen to 40% or more depending on whether it's basic or earnings that you're looking at. So why isn't that attracting younger people as professional drivers, while the number of vans continues to grow? Continued below graph...

Now, the van drivers' wages may well be pulled down by part-time working, although using the median is likely to have removed this as a factor, but it raises the issue of flexibility. Back in 2004 I wrote a Viewpoint for Motor Transport, very little of which is out of date. Perhaps it's time to repeat the research referred to in my article, which is still available: SfL Scotland Survey 2003 - the comments from former drivers are important, particularly as this group were still sufficiently interested in LGVs and the road haulage industry to have attended Truckfest, where this element of research was carried out.

In the recent CILT survey on the driver shortage, question 27 asked: What factors do you think are responsible for the driver shortage? I'm guessing that this has been completed by managers, but there's no real point in interviewing current drivers - two reasons: they've stuck with it and many of them don't represent the future workforce.

Perhaps there's a need to research outside our own industry and find out what people like about their jobs and explore whether those factors can be replicated for truck drivers.